Organise the building file and approval status
Arrange building permits, plans, completion notices and authority correspondence by date and building part. If the file is incomplete, make a specific request to the competent building authority.
Unauthorised extension in a judicial auction valuation: review the building file, actual condition, use, possible costs and bidder risk before bidding.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for real estate, corporate law and civil proceedings
We review the court file and property documents, explain the likely legal and financial consequences, and agree the next step with you.
An unauthorised extension can materially affect a bid decision in a judicial auction. It is not enough that a room or building part appears in the valuation report. A bidder must establish what is actually built, which approvals exist and what the difference may mean for use, cost and value.
The valuation report is not a building-law review. Before bidding, place the report, the building file, the land register, the auction edict and your own inspection notes in one dated working file.
The wording in the valuation report is a review signal. Whether a building part required approval, whether an approval exists and whether the as-built condition is covered depends on the applicable provincial building law and the specific building file. The absence of an attached document does not by itself prove that the structure is unlawful.
Conversely, a building part described in the report must not be treated as approved without checking the authority file. For each affected part, ask for the approval, plan status, completion record and later amendments.
Section 141 EO provides that the valuation is carried out under the Real Estate Valuation Act unless the EO provides otherwise. The relevant date is the day of the inspection. For buildings, the expert should also include a floor plan and at least one image. Compare the inspection date, plans and images with the present condition.
Create a table with the room or building part, stated area, actual use, plan status, approval evidence and open question. The article on the court valuation report explains the review of findings, date and attachments.
No single document proves the building-law and economic classification on its own.
| Review field | What to check | Follow-up question |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation report | Description, areas, use, images and inspection date | Which assumption supports the value? |
| Building file | Permits, plans, completion and authority letters | Does the built condition match the file? |
| Inspection | Actual condition, access, damage and use | Which difference is recorded and provable? |
| Land register and edict | Property, rights, encumbrances and supplied documents | Which information applies to this proceeding? |
An unresolved extension can make use, financing and later resale more difficult. Depending on the findings, the review may include building adjustments, subsequent approval, a change of use or demolition. Which option is legally and technically available can only be assessed from the file, the actual building and the competent authority.
Do not treat these uncertainties as solved and fold them into the valuation figure. Keep the stated value, known costs, possible additional costs and your personal bid limit separate. The bid budget planner helps structure the calculation but does not replace a building-law review.
Bidders must account for the special risk of a judicial auction. Section 189(2) EO excludes a warranty claim based on incorrect statements in the auction edict or in the files supplied before the auction concerning the property or its accessories.
That does not make every open question irrelevant. It means that the available documents must be assessed before bidding and that uncertainty must not be treated as an assured property. The guide to the bidder risk and the review of the auction edict form part of the preparation.
Work through the warning in the report using specific documents.
Record room, area, use and position in the property.
Mark the inspection date, images, plan and valuation assumptions.
Match permits, plans and later authority correspondence.
Separate use, financing, remediation and possible next steps.
Keep uncertainties and reserves outside the valuation figure.
Review findings, date and attachments.
Read statements, encumbrances and documents before bidding.
Arrange registered rights and proceeding documents.
Prepare documents and the bidding decision.
Structure the court file and property documents.
Call the firm or send us an email. We will review your enquiry and contact you.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000